Re: virtual package inetd-superserver?

[Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>]

Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> writes:
> On Jul 08, Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@vega.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

>> I've noticed that the virtual package name `inetd-superserver' is
>> defined in the list of virtual package names, but it isn't used.
>> Instead, `inet-superserver' is used by openbsd-inetd, rlinetd, and
>> so on.

> Looks like a typo.

>> Why?  Should `inetd-superserver' be replaced with `inet-superserver'?

> Yes.

Thanks, fixed in my arch repository.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>