On Jul 08, Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@vega.ocn.ne.jp> wrote: > I've noticed that the virtual package name `inetd-superserver' is > defined in the list of virtual package names, but it isn't used. > Instead, `inet-superserver' is used by openbsd-inetd, rlinetd, and > so on. Looks like a typo. > Why? Should `inetd-superserver' be replaced with `inet-superserver'? Yes. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature