On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:30, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > I doubt that that BR deserves an RC severity to be honest. > > > > Really? The package *has no module*. It is a package which exists > > *only to provide a module*. > > Let me phrase it differently then: not all RC bugs are equally urgent. I installed the package, which was automatically upgraded since I have the previous version of the module which you had to build yourself. My network immediately failed. At that point, I had to walk across campus where I could plug in to a wired ethernet, identify the problem, rebuild the module, forcibly install the new package, and now place the package on hold until a fix arrives. The bug bites unsuspecting people by disabling their network. It could even thus be of severity "critical". Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part