Re: RFC: declaritive diversions
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> I don't have much to contribute to a discussion (other than to say that
> the idea seems reasonable), but I would like to register my interest in
> being a pair of eyeballs for whatever spec you come up with for this.
> Currently, maintainers that use diversions tend to go through a lot of
> false starts in trying to get the ordering right, particularly when a
> diversion is dropped from a package, so it would be great to see dpkg
> make this easier.
First steps first, I know, but I'd *love* to see this done for
alternatives as well.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>