Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams
- From: Oleg Verych <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 23:59:46 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <20070526194850.GB11002@ouaza.com> <email@example.com> <20070526215854.GD16286@artemis> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20070526222208.GA14540@scowler.net> <20070526235330.GA4116@verizon.net> <20070529180017.GC21508@keid.carnet.hr> <20070530001508.GA3981@verizon.net>
* From: David Nusinow <email@example.com>
* Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:15:08 -0400
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:00:17PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:53:30PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>> > The only thing I've ever heard about helping out with the website is that
>> > it's a herculean task that no mere mortal should attempt.
>> Where did you hear this?
> Word of mouth, usually in conjunction with promises that the site would be
> updated to not look like it came from the 90's and no visible improvements
> in that area. I'd heard about meetings at debconf/debcamps to work on this,
> and yet the site still looks almost identical to the way it did when I
> first downloaded Debian back in 1999.
Sure it is, and will be for me.
>> What's next in this fine line of reasoning, I wonder? It doesn't have
>> a MS Windows GUI that my granny thinks is trivial, therefore it sucks?
> I don't consider my job in Debian to maintain the website. I consider my
> job to help maintain X. I've taken it upon myself to work on the XSF wiki
> pages because it's useful and important, but it's clearly a secondary
> concern to actually working on the software. Given this, anything that
> makes the job easier and more trivial so I can focus on what I consider to
> be important is a very valid reason.
As lynx user to mutt user, i want to say: "Thank you very much!" ;)
> I think that any tool that lets us do this should be considered. Debian
> isn't in the website creating business, we're in the Free Software
> Distribution creating business. If a tool, like a wiki, makes it
> substantially easier for us to go about that business then yes, I think we
> should use it.
I second this.