Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 09:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > Yes, and that's the problem: I know the libgl shlibs to have been wrong in
> > certain corner cases involving uncommon symbols (whether those are
> > implementors adding their own extensions, or failing to implement the
> > standard, or just exposing symbols in the lib that aren't part of the API in
> > the headers, I don't know).
>
> And how would the new system help ?
You could make "standard" symbols lead to dependencies on either libgl
package, while specific symbols would bring a dependency on the specific
package providing them.
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`- our own. Resistance is futile.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Dependencies on shared libs, take 2
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>