Re: Reasonable maximum package size ?
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Then it should be obvious
obvious = common sense
... but the "commons sense" has to be defined in a technical document.
that it's a bad idea to add to the archive
multiple packages each containing hundred of megabits of data which are
only useful for a few users.
So you propose "hundred of megabits" as the size border?
Could you please be more verbose on "a few".
Please stop teaching people who try to discuss a problem by
dead beat arguments and give precise numbers as answers if
you have any.