Neil Williams <email@example.com> writes: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:47:20 +0200 > Christoph Haas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> > What about embedded systems that can barely run sqlite? >> >> Is sqlite really *that* heavyweight? > > No, that's why it is used in some embedded systems. Even so, it has no > place in the rootfs for an embedded system, IMHO. I'd rather not have > to repackage apt to remove this change. Why would it need to be on the root? Surely the binaries and data would just go on /usr and /var as normal? Perhaps just using sqlite as an (optional) cache for dpkg and/or apt would bring sufficient improvements to systems which desire it. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Description: PGP signature