[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intention to drop sparc32 support for Lenny


Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:

> The problem is, and that has been mentioned before, that *there is no 
> upstream maintainer* for sparc32. Unless some people step up and ensure 
> that upstream issues _are_ fixed in a timely manner, sparc32 is 
> effectively dead.

"Upstream" should really read "kernel", right?

> Kernel development moves too fast for that.

Or does it wander too fast?  ;-)


Reply to: