Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
On ti, 2007-05-22 at 13:30 +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> 1. The GPLv3: the latest draft did not raise major objections from
> -legal and despite its concerns with the strategies developed in some
> sections, Debian does consider it DFSG-free. Debian will however not
> push for its adoption, mainly because we still have much software that
> is GPLv2-only in the distribution.
Why it that a valid, or even relevant reason to avoid pushing GPLv3?
What does pushing mean in this context?
Every time I say /quit I die a little.