Re: Bug#422423: ITP: libtool-cvs -- Generic library support script - CVS snapshot
Do you mean I should just renumber the package version from 2.1a to 1.9 or what? I think the versioning schema for this project is very bizzare. Also I think it is not so important for experimental packages :)
2007/5/7, Kurt Roeckx <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> 2007/5/7, Florian Weimer <email@example.com>:
> >* Mike Hommey:
> >> Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
> >It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
> >a good thing.
> I think the including libtool from cvs snapshot to the unstable
> distribution might be good for its development process. More people
> will use it and then more people will report the bugs.
> Nevertheless, I'm uloading the packages as libtool/experimental. My
> packages are located at
Please use a version of 1.9. It's not because upstream now calls this
2.1a that it won't be released as 2.0.
.''`. Piotr Roszatycki
: :' : mailto:Piotr.Roszatycki@gmail.com
`. `' mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org