Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:10:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:06:55PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The point is that it's pretty useless to have a backtrace without line
> > numbers. It would be interesting if there was an option similar to -g1,
> > but that would keep the line numbers (without the burden of keeping the
> > whole source code)
> Are you sure the source code is in there with -g? I was pretty sure it
> wasn't, only line numbers.
You're indeed right. I wrote quicker than my thoughts.