On Saturday 17 March 2007 09.29:10 Peter Samuelson wrote: > "x86=64" would have been > amusing too. Is it a veiled Commodore 64 reference, or is it > quoted-printable? Not to speak of broken mime decoders that would just display x86d. I'd rather say it's to do something with Georg Orwell. If 2+2=5, then we can also have 86=64, I don't know what happens to the x, though. Hmm. Or we could just call the architecture x=0.744 cheers -- vbi -- Wer A sagt, der muß nicht B sagen. Er kann auch erkennen, daß A falsch war. -- Bertold Brecht
Attachment:
pgpizySBSGFle.pgp
Description: PGP signature