Re: On maintainers not responding to bugs
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@connexer.com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:26:45PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > What do people look on the following idea: not allow packages to
> > migrate from sid to testing if they have unanswered bug reports
> > with severity >= normal?
>
> Bad idea. This penalizes inremental work. I.e., package foo gets
> seven important bugs filed against it. The maintainer fixes three
> and uploads. That is certainly an improvement. Your proposal
> penalizes that maintainer for not fixing all of them at one go.
Nikita wrote "unanswered", you seem to have misread that as "unfixed".
I believe Nikita is proposing a way to focus on the lack of *any
response* by the package maintainer to particular bug reports, not the
lack of fixes.
--
\ "Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave |
`\ trade was to the 16th." -- David Mertz |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Reply to: