Le lundi 19 février 2007 à 11:05 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit : > I guess, even when someone really does try to be level headed and cool > about the whole thing, they get shutdown exactly the same way I do... > just a bit more gentle. You mean, like Christian Schaller who actually chose to submit Torvalds' patches to Bugzilla, and saw 2 of them committed the same day? > And what caused me to switch? No not this little spat 'tween Linus and > GNOME's dev team, but one of those "Never seen by Joss" happenings. I'd be interested to know the reasoning behind this sentence (except for the sole purpose of being deliberately provocative). > I don't have it handy, but gconf was terminated as it was segfaulting > and restarting 5+ (maybe more) times a second and then gnome-panel and > nautilus and most other things needing a settings daemon choked. And no, > this wasn't on a login, it just happened when I was watching a DVD using > totem. I tried to logout and back in... but it continued to happen. Even > a reboot (I though maybe some libraries may have been corrupted in > memory) might fix it. Nope. I have already explained more than once that bugs won't be fixed if you don't report them. > So, I guess I am that black-sheep of the GNOME userbase that has magical > "never before known or seen" problems. > > Adios to GNOME. At least the parts I can leave behind, which is most of > it. If you could also shut the fuck up, that would be even better. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=