Re: x86 buildd for experimental ?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Mike Hommey <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > > As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
> > > > amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
> > > >
> > > > I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
> > > > there any x86 autobuilder set up for experimental ?
> > >
> > > There was no i386 autobuilder in the last few weeks. This has changed
> > > now, Joerg Jaspert provided a Xen instance on one of his servers, which
> > > I set up as buildd tonight and is now happily building packages. The
> > > first few experimental gnome packages are already uploaded, rest should
> > > follow in the next few days.
> > (More than a few days later, it seems like still nothing is
> > happening...)
> i can see a couple of logs signed by Marc, so what do you complain about
> exactly? Marc is working on all packages from experimental, though it
> might take a while to build all packages in the right order do get all
> packages (like gnome 2.10) compiled in the right order.
I would assume 10 days is enough to "automatically" build all that
is in experimental...