[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: update-inetd

On Jan 11, Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org> wrote:

> The solution to this could be
> a) Every package calling update-inetd should call it twice; once for
>    IPv4, and again for IPv6.  This would require all packages to be
>    updated.
> b) update-inetd should default to creating both unless explicitly told
>    not to.  This has the advantage of being transparent.
b would be the correct solution.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: