On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:37:53PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > - Provide an HTML interface to the pool > > > > If the packages names are the same I don't see the need to add yet another > > line to the debian/control file, packages.debian.org would just need to point > > to http://screenshots.debian.org/<package_name> and that's it. > > > Good idea. I'd not though about it that way. We would then only need a > default place holder for packages without screenshots. Which would be easy to code if the screenshots access was governed by a CGI. > > Do you mean server requirements? I guess that it's disk and bandwidth. > > As for limitations, if you are restricting this to DD uploads there is a > > severe limitation (i.e. users cannot 'contribute' screenshots) > > > What about my suggestion for user contributed screenshots via bug > reports? The BTS accepts attachments to emails, so I think that would > work. I think it would be best to follow backports.org here (read its 'contribution' page) and have users upload just like developers, using FTP since that makes it fully automated. Maybe provide a mechanism for DDs to be notified when a screenshot for their package has been uploaded (just like with binary packages) so they can veto it (with a new upload). Going through the BTS route means both clogging the BTS and also needing somebody to manually review the submissions. > > I say that is a good idea, but I'm not sure how screenshots.debian.org would > > help your friend. If you are talking about one-five screenshot per package > > (or per package version) that is hardly sufficient to explain how a package > > manager works. Better yet if someone wrote a package management document > > using DocBook and including screenshots and that was published in the > > website. > > > Here is how it would help. He wants an email client and so he searches > for one. The list includes icedove, sylpheed, mutt, kmail, evolution > and others. They all have descriptions, but he can't visualize what > they look like, especially not being familiar with them. Having > screenshots available makes it so that he can compare them, at least > based on how they look. Ok. I didn't understand your use case. The use of the descriptions in the packages + screenshots for this use case is certainly something that would help him get idea of wether a given package does (or does not) fit his needs. Regards Javier PS: And after screenshots.debian.org we could go with video-demos.debian.org which provided small animations or videos of the programs *being*used* which is cooler (and could be easy to implement provided there is an infraestructrure for static images) :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature