Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 23:57 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> And why do you think that? please take a look at the RES values.

I know you don't understand it, because you just appealed to the RSS
values.

If many processes are sharing text, they all get accounted with the size
of the resident text in their RSS, but they are sharing the segment;
they are not each getting their own copy.

Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part