Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 4
Bill Allombert writes:
> Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
> g++-3.3
> g++-3.4
> g++-4.0
> g++-4.1
> gcj
> gcj-4.0
> gcj-4.1
> java-gcj-compat
> libgcj-dev
> libgcj6-dev
> libgcj7-dev
> libstdc++5-3.3-dev
> libstdc++6-4.0-dev
> libstdc++6-4.1-dev
> libstdc++6-dev
>
> Debian GCC maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
> g++-2.95
> libstdc++2.10-dev
maybe the corresponding g++-X.Y and libstdc++-Z-X.Z-dev packages could
be solved by merging these packages. Anyway, these binaries are built
from the same source, so we should ot care-
I currently do not understand the java-gcj-compat / gcj-4.X relationship.
> Debian OpenOffice Team <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>
> openoffice.org-common
> openoffice.org-core
that's just a splitting into arch/indep packages. you sould not warn
about it.
> Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
> python-netcdf
> python-scientific
same thing.
Reply to: