Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

To: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:54:52 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87hd75lr0z.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87slqq2k0k.fsf@marant.org> (Jérôme Marant's message of "Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:48:59 +0100")
References: <20060120013926.GK30495@archimedes.ucr.edu> <200601192111.12920.chrsmrtn@debian.org> <[🔎] 20060208082136.GA18038@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com> <[🔎] d0461dbe0602080850n1c7b4b4eo99f8bde5216f76d9@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20060209030532.GB28269@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com> <[🔎] 87d5hxyyki.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060209040539.GA14545@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 877j85yvpc.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060209085909.GA6144@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 1139483803.43eb249b90826@imp6-g19.free.fr> <[🔎] 20060209140959.GB32659@khazad-dum.debian.net> <[🔎] 87ek2crv7i.fsf@marant.org> <[🔎] 87pslw86r6.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 87slqq2k0k.fsf@marant.org>

Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
>
>> Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:
>>
>>> That was a 3:1 majority out of 200 voters, considering that Debian
>>> counts almost 1000 developers and considering that many pros are
>>> convinced they have been deceived.
>>
>> Who, please?
>
> Me, at least.  I did not imagine it would lead to some extreme
> interpretations.

So if it were labelled just "proposed changes to the social contract"
you would have been able to see those "extreme interpretations"
coming?  How does the labelling affect that?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Next by Date: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Previous by thread: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Next by thread: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread