Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:
>
>> That was a 3:1 majority out of 200 voters, considering that Debian
>> counts almost 1000 developers and considering that many pros are
>> convinced they have been deceived.
>
> Who, please?
Me, at least. I did not imagine it would lead to some extreme
interpretations.
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>