Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

[Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>]

Le jeudi 09 février 2006 à 23:50 +0100, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
> 
> > md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> >
> >> On Feb 09, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This was necessary only because the release manager believed the changes
> >>> to be non-editorial. I cannot even understand an interpretation of the
> >>> old wording that can lead us to accept non-free documentation into main.
> >
> >> This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an
> >> interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to
> >> accept non-free documentation into main.
> >
> > How is this relevant?
> 
> Consistency?

There is nothing like consistency in someone asserting that "Debian Will
Remain 100% Free Software" means "98% free software and 2% non-free
other things".
-- 
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=