Re: Explications needed...
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> Don't you find it a bit hypocrit to have x86 uploads go directly to the
>> archive, and not allowing even a single day delay which would allow to
>> stop unclean DD-build-boxes breakage and a clean state, and on the
>> other day let the other arches depend on the good will of the buildd
>> maintainer, who is usually a single person, who doesn't communicate
>> much, and who sometimes is not able to sign and thus upload the
>> packages for a couple of days (sometimes more even, but i guess this is
>> the exception).
> It's even better than this. The DD could upload on any arch and let
> buildds do the job for the others. The arch could even be arm.
Indeed, I've started occasionally uploading some of my packages as amd64
instead of x86 precisely so that they'll autobuild on x86 and I can notice
any problems that for some reason my local pbuilder environment didn't
pick up.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: