Re: Correct fate for emacs20 bugs?
Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> So I'm going through the old bugs list. There are 37 bugs against
> emacs20. emacs20 is only in oldstable-security at this point. What
> is the correct fate for these bugs?
Good question. If the bugs still exist in emacs21, then they should
be reassigned (or cloned). Otherwise, emacs20 is a very, very low
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4