Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386)
* Thomas Dickey (dickey@radix.net) [061130 14:12]:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> > a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
>
> It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
> wrong place. I'd point out that it doesn't solve the problem, and
> that the program is still subject to the same issue as reported, but
> that would be redundant.
So, what do you think would be the appropriate behaviour? I don't mind
changing the behaviour to something which sounds sensible for you too,
but - taking the files from the cwd opens up a can of issues.
> I've noticed that my comments to followup on the lynx bug reports are
> ignored by the package maintainer as well as the security team.
I'm sorry, but I didn't see any comments from you on this bug report -
though perhaps I didn't look deep enough.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: