Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386)
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:20:59PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Ove Kaaven wrote:
> > I won't, I package them in order. Lagging behind is just because of my
> > irregular schedule, I tend to have lots of other things to do with my
> > time, but it has always been my goal to catch up if nothing gets in the
> > way (and last time, something did, as you can see from my changelog).
> > Now, with my current disk issues solved, if I manage to upload one
> > package per day, as planned, it should take me a whole 4 days to catch
> > up. Try to deal with it.
> What's the benefit of having all versions in the archive? Imho it only
> put's unnecessary/additional load on the buildds.
For wine, an i386-only package? I don't think so. :) What it *does* do is
put unnecessary additional load on the mirror network. Not a significant
one with wine taken by itself, but this still strikes me as a fairly
antisocial approach to packaging.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.