Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:11:27 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061114161127.GA29716@bongo.bofh.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061113231202.GA37492@vasa.acc.umu.se>
References: <87y7r59bkw.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <20061025180132.GA10298@roeckx.be> <878xj46xk0.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <87lkn09pqt.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 87velttf63.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 873b8pmeqr.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20061112134441.GR28384@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> <[🔎] 4E853F2B4B%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 20061113231202.GA37492@vasa.acc.umu.se>

On Nov 14, David Weinehall <tao@debian.org> wrote:

> > busybox?
> Such a requirement would at least be wonderful for us embedded developers...
But hardly practical, IIRC there are some commonly used shell features
supported by dash but not busybox.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
  - From: David Weinehall <tao@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

References:
- Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
  - From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu>
- Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
  - From: Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
- Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
  - From: David Weinehall <tao@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released
Next by Date: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Next by thread: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread