Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
* Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) [061106 23:40]:
> My impression of the previous Policy discussion was that there was not a
> consensus around this change, so I'm trying to reach a consensus around a
> simpler incremental change that deals with one problem (while still
> leaving others opened). This should in no way be taken as a cutting off
> of debate of the larger issue.
I agree with you that we should try to get rid of the "simple issues" so
that we we have both an already updated policy and can see what the
larger issues really are.