Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a
> > > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam
> > > without preventing non-DD's helping out.
> > OTOH, a /lot/ of legitimate mail is sent to the BTS w/o a Package:
> > pseudo-header (think: pretty much anything to
> > firstname.lastname@example.org). So this isn't really a solution.
> I don't think that disqualifies it as a solution, it just means there
> would be a transition period while users learn that it is a required
> part of messages sent to the BTS.
It isn't currently a requirement (or indeed any use at all), so
introducing a requirement just to compat spam does not seem like a good
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>