Re: First draft of review of policy must usage

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:44:53 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061026004453.GA23859@azure.humbug.org.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87hcxs8ojx.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
References: <[🔎] 87y7r59bkw.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] e8bbf0360610250635q2b0ae1a6p72f7b65fd82f066b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87hcxs8ojx.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         The only normative words are MUST, SHOULD, MAY, and
>  RECOMMENDED.  I am considering using upper case where we expect
>  conformance.

Didn't the definitions of MUST/SHOULD/MAY get removed in your patch though?

Cheers,
aj

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

References:
- First draft of review of policy must usage
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
  - From: "Margarita Manterola" <margamanterola@gmail.com>
- Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: openssh packages with updated selinux patch
Next by Date: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
Previous by thread: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
Next by thread: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread