On Tuesday 24 October 2006 23:18, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Either of these would be fine (though looking at the size of > libselinux1, I wonder if there are any numbers behind the burden > theory?), but that would be a more intrusive change for openssh than > I am willing to make as a non-maintainer at this stage of the game. We don't need any "numbers". The installer runs fully in memory, sometimes on systems with very little memory, and a lot of it runs before swap is/can be enabled. This means that _every_ byte is worth saving. Call it a design goal. Cheers, FJP
Attachment:
pgpc2TsmmeK67.pgp
Description: PGP signature