Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:39:14 +0200, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> said:
> * Roland Mas (lolando@debian.org) [061025 22:38]:
>> Luk Claes, 2006-10-25 18:51:26 +0200 :
>>
>> > It was not meant that way at all. I just don't like that people
>> > start to discuss topics that are long overdue near release
>> > time...
>>
>> Topics that are long overdue should, by definition, be discussed
>> and worked on *now*, regardless of whether "now" happens to be
>> (presented as) close to release time.
> Changing the release policy is obviously a non-possibility now.
Quite so. But getting a handle on policy flaws and creating a
list of issues that need clarification can start now -- assuming, of
course, that the people working on this do not let it hamper their
efforts directed at improving release quality.
manoj
--
No question is so difficult as one to which the answer is obvious.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: