Re: On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)
From: Hendrik Sattler <debian@hendrik-sattler.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:37:28 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200610211237.34680.debian@hendrik-sattler.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200610211349.11481@sercond.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 200610211349.11481@sercond.localdomain>

Am Samstag 21 Oktober 2006 11:49 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> Question is - does Debian i386 currently support running on 64-bit binaries
> if hardware supports it?

_and_ if the kernel supports it.

> Linux blacky 2.6.18-1-k7 #1 SMP Fri Sep 29 17:06:47 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux

-k7 is for Athlon without 64bit extensions.
64bit kernels are not available in the i386 archieve. That makes the 64bit 
libs rather useless, doesn't it?

HS

Attachment: pgpltaUW1XvkM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)
  - From: Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
- Re: On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)
  - From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@debian.org>

References:
- On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)
  - From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug mass filling
Next by Date: Re: Bug mass filling
Previous by thread: On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)
Next by thread: Re: On including 64-bit libs in 32-bit packages (see #344104)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread