Re: Experiment: orphanining some of my packages (third round)

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Experiment: orphanining some of my packages (third round)
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:24:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0610151318550.21249@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061015005656.GA2216@bode.aurel32.net>
References: <[🔎] 45209B95.2000307@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 4520DA29.4070703@aurel32.net> <[🔎] 20061015005656.GA2216@bode.aurel32.net>

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

The results of *all 4 GR* show me that I don't share the goals of the


Well, I read the 4 GRs so that only one of them is connected to the
goal of the project which was stated as "building a free operating"
system and the other three GRs just decide about the path to this
goal.  I hope you will not stop to support the goal to build a free
operating system.

Kind regards

          Andreas.


--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- Experiment: orphanining some of my packages
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Re: Experiment: orphanining some of my packages (second round)
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Re: Experiment: orphanining some of my packages (third round)
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

Prev by Date: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Next by Date: Re: Can someone explain : " wmaker (0.92.0-6) is newer than that in Debian!"
Previous by thread: Re: Experiment: orphanining some of my packages (third round)
Next by thread: Re: Experiment: orphanining some of my packages (fourth round)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread