Re: lilypond and thanks to Rob Browning
Frank Küster <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <email@example.com> wrote:
>> It is my hope that #359855 will not exist in the new lilypond.
>> However, this is just a hope. If ghostscript continues to have such a
>> bug, then solving it will become of critical priority for getting
>> lilypond into the release.
> Are your preliminary packages of 2.8 avaiable anywhere, as well as the
> guile-1.8 packages? I wanted to try, but got more problems with 2.6
> which probably aren't worth reporting when we're trying to get 2.8 in.
I don't have the guile 1.8 packages; you could ask Rob Browning for
them I assume.
But Bill Allombert has helpfully provided a hint about what will solve
the bug; if that works, I'll upload 2.6 now with the RC bugs fixed,
and 2.8 as soon as feasible.