Re: lilypond and thanks to Rob Browning
Thomas Bushnell BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It is my hope that #359855 will not exist in the new lilypond.
> However, this is just a hope. If ghostscript continues to have such a
> bug, then solving it will become of critical priority for getting
> lilypond into the release.
Are your preliminary packages of 2.8 avaiable anywhere, as well as the
guile-1.8 packages? I wanted to try, but got more problems with 2.6
which probably aren't worth reporting when we're trying to get 2.8 in.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)