Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Em Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:47:09 -0300
Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org> escreveu:
> Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> writes:
>
> > e.g.
> > build: test_stable patch build-stamp
> > instead of
> > build: patch build-stamp
>
> That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
> more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
> much :-D
It does not look right to me, though.. what about buildds? And what
about people forgetting an exported variable saying yes? I much rather
the manual solution, or a solution for dak that detects that the target
distribution changed and requests a confirmation by signed email, for
instance.
See you,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/
Reply to: