Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> writes:
>> That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
>> more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
>> much :-D
>
> It does not look right to me, though.. what about buildds? And what
> about people forgetting an exported variable saying yes? I much rather
> the manual solution, or a solution for dak that detects that the target
> distribution changed and requests a confirmation by signed email, for
> instance.
I dunno if it's right to do that on DAK itself. I think that it can be
done by the development scripts.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: