[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs

Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> writes:

>> That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
>> more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
>> much :-D
> It does not look right to me, though.. what about buildds? And what
> about people forgetting an exported variable saying yes? I much rather
> the manual solution, or a solution for dak that detects that the target
> distribution changed and requests a confirmation by signed email, for
> instance.

I dunno if it's right to do that on DAK itself. I think that it can be
done by the development scripts.

        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Reply to: