Re: dak now supports ~ in version numbers
* Don Armstrong:
>> Should we really start using this feature even though it violates
>> section 5.6.12 of the Policy?
> Policy was written like that because the changes delineated in
> martin's message had yet to be implemented. It should be updated
> accordingly, but that by itself is no reason not to use them.
Nevertheless, it would have been nice to have a policy patch ready, so
that those with independent implementations of the version comparison
algorithm could have updated their code in time. 8-(