Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

To: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools
From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:02:15 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060808090215.8732.qmail@oak.oeko.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060807115226.GA16522@lapse.madduck.net>
References: <20060730205521.GB19326@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <87lkqa53z9.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 20060807102608.9231.qmail@oak.oeko.net> <[🔎] 20060807115226.GA16522@lapse.madduck.net>

Hi,

On Mon, 07.08.2006 at 12:52:26 +0100, martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> wrote:
> also sprach Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org> [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
> > what are your problems with CDBS?
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00451.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00467.html

hmmm, for me, CDBS feels very much like BSD's ports system.

That notwithstanding, it could be enhanced (what couldn't?).


Best,
--Toni++

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools
  - From: Christian Aichinger <Greek0@gmx.net>

References:
- Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools
  - From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
- Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation
Next by Date: Re: Pan in Sid
Previous by thread: Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools
Next by thread: Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread