Re: dh_python and python policy analysis
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Not sure if I missed it, but you seem to claim a copyright but not give
> an explicit license. I imagine you meant to put it under GPL or a free
> version of the GFDL. Could you please clarify and also add it to the
I couldn't care less whether this thing has a license or not, but if it
gets one, I'm sure Manoj will *not* choose any variant of the GNU "Free"
Documentation License. And nobody should do that, or encourage people
to use this flawed license. Note that we have voted by a GR that the
GFDL is acceptable under certain conditions - but not that it is a good
license. It isn't.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)