[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: exim4 & spf: #377034 & #258210

On Jul 06, Alexander Vlasov <zulu@gala.net> wrote:

> But I have some objections: 
> 1) first reason is not true anymore. Since
> 2004 SPF has a lot of testing; 
Which showed well that it is a bad idea.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: