Re: Testing excuses question

[Andrew Vaughan <ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>]

On Monday 26 June 2006 23:08, Jiri Palecek wrote:
> Sorry, I do not understand. You mean the "breaks xx packages" thingy?
>
> I have already said, that of these 74 packages, 15 are dependent,
> and they are more or less prepared to enter testing along with
> neon. The rest only depends on those 15, and seem (I have not
> checked all) to be OK if the 15 go in (eg. they don't have to go in).

Upgrading neon breaks subversion (and other packages), but subversion is 
waiting for both neon and perl.  Perl FTBFS on hppa and mips.  

HTH
Andrew V.