Re: Netatalk and SSL

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org> writes:

> Ah, I see the confusion (or maybe have some of my own).  I am not talking
> about a GPL application that has been modified to use libssl.  I am
> talking about a GPL application that uses a library, and that library
> could or could not link to libssl - the higher level application does
> not itself care or notice.  I am not talking about changing the GPL
> application to directly use the GPL incompatible library.  Maybe that
> applies to gnucash, but I'm trying to understand the more general case.

Right.  So, you cannot distribute binaries if they do, in fact, link
to ssl.

Thomas