Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental)
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <email@example.com> writes:
> [Don suggested to use the tags _and_ the versioning information in a
> transitional period; I'm not 100% sure what this buys us, except that I'm
> not sure how well britney would cope without.]
> 4. Run a script over the archive (like the one I made a while ago -- sources
> available for anyone who needs it :-) ) to remove all the instance of
> these two tags, and replace them by versioned closes.
Does that mean one can't get a list of bugs fixed in NMUs anymore? As
maintainer one might want to read up on those bugs specificaly without
having to parse the changelog for bug numbers.