also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> [2006.06.02.0830 +0200]:
> Why do you replace initramfs-tools and not just initramfs-tools << 0.60
> (or 0.63 as is the version you conflict with)?
Mh, that's a human error. Thanks for spotting it.
> Also, depending on makedev | udev would be more correct, wouldn't
> it?
Well, not until I have worked out what to do about makedev. Since
mdadm can now properly create nodes as needed, I think it would be
okay to do without makedev and simply let them be created on-demand.
Or is the policy to be interpreted that I must not do that and
should create them in postinst no matter what?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
$complex->{'data'}[$structures][$in_perl] = @{$can{'be'}->[$painful]};
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)