[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: about mdadm 2.5-1/experimental

also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> [2006.06.02.0830 +0200]:
> Why do you replace initramfs-tools and not just initramfs-tools << 0.60 
> (or 0.63 as is the version you conflict with)?

Mh, that's a human error. Thanks for spotting it.

> Also, depending on makedev | udev would be more correct, wouldn't
> it?

Well, not until I have worked out what to do about makedev. Since
mdadm can now properly create nodes as needed, I think it would be
okay to do without makedev and simply let them be created on-demand.
Or is the policy to be interpreted that I must not do that and
should create them in postinst no matter what?

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
$complex->{'data'}[$structures][$in_perl] = @{$can{'be'}->[$painful]};

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: