Le Lun 29 Mai 2006 03:40, Matthias Klose a écrit : > the only thing that is correct. is the syntax. everything else is > wrong. the messages should have been generated for gcc-snapshot (if > at all), but not for 4.1. debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356569 is about gcc-4.1, look at it. if it should be about gcc-snapshot, then please triage your own bugs the right way. > > 2) While I can do so, adding administrative prohibitions over > > something which should be worked out between the GCC maintainers > > and the btslink maintainers is not something that I'm going to do > > as an initial step. > > that's difficult, emails to to > bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org are automatically rejected, > if you're not subscribed. I really do not intend to subscribe to each > system / ML, which sends bogus control messages. that has been fixed, I wanted to do it before, and forgot about it I'm sorry. I remind that the first line of bts-link is a link to D-D-A where my own debian adress lies. next mails will be sent with a reply-to on the bts-link-devel@ Mail List. > > What problems with the information in the BTS are you talking > > about? > > the usertags, which are wrongly set and removed. oh, that's new, since when, usertags of user *BTS-LINK-UPSTREAM*, and that have their own semantics, which is clear like I already said to you: bts-link-upstream tags are tags that tracks upstream STATUS/RESOLUTION. and I'm sorry but http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26757 has: * Status REOPENED => usertag status-REOPENED * Resolution None => no resolution usertag > please don't get me wrong; generally the btslink information is > useful, but I do see the BTS maintainers in charge as well, if the > system is "misused". we did see this in the past with unreflected > changes of the forwarded information, now with wrong usertags. what > comes next? please don't get me wrong, but even if that was an abuse, BTS maintainers have nothing to do with it. I repeat for the third and last time, for bug reports/improvements/whishes, please contact me (or better bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org). I'm sorry bts-link is not in the BTS, but I should package related tools soon so that there will be one, and a place in the BTS to send bugs to. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpOZqUwtU9aC.pgp
Description: PGP signature