Re: openssl will block bacula into etch?

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:

> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:55:39AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > regards,
>> > -- stratus
>> 
>> Any source that builds udebs is always frozen (openssl builds
>> libcrypto0.9.8-udeb). Udebs have to be moved into testing manualy and
>> without the freeze the source+deb and udeb versions would drift apart.
>> Another reason for this is so that the Debian-installer have a
>> consistent set of udebs to work with.
>
>
> Hmm.  But openssl is in testing already, and bacula doesn't build-dep
> on a newer version.  Why does it matter?

I bet it depends on the new version that isn't in testing.

Looking at the packages.qa.d.o page for bacula I see different reasons
why bacula won't go into testing. Age, Bugs. Fix that before you worry
about some depends.

>> You have to ask -release to hint openssl in if the bacula change is
>> important.
>
> Done.  There was no Bacula in testing at all, since it had been
> removed in February due to bugginess.  So yes, I'd call it important.

Nothing important then. No bugs or security holes to fix.

MfG
        Goswin