Re: Mass bug filing: failure to use invoke-rc.d when required
On 15 May 2006, Bastian Blank told this:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:10:52AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> I propose to file bugs against the packages before the end of this
>> week, and, after a couple of weeks, for packages that haven't been
>> fixed already, start making NMUs (via DELAYED/7, since they're not
>> RC) to get the packages fixed.
> The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not RC?
> This does not fit.
Not all serious bugs are RC, and not all RC bugs are serious?
There is a large intersection, but neither set is a proper
subset of the other.
If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C